Chirag v. Sanchit Bansal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appeal received that it was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the appellant, and hence dismissed. Pending applications stood disposed of.
What the court decided
$~50
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RFA(COMM) 66/2023 CM APPL. 18394/2023 CM APPL. 18395/2023 CM APPL. 18397/2023 CHIRAG
..... APPELLANT Through: Mr.Sudhir K Saneja, Advocate. versus
SANCHIT BANSAL
..... RESPONDENT Through: Mr.Kartik Malhotra, Mr.Anindit Mandal, Mr.Jankee Ballabh Pandey, Ms.Madhu Bala, Mr.Shantanu Jha, Mr.Praveen Shekhar and Mr.Pravin Kumar Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 12.03.2024 1. The learned counsel for the appellant who appears through video conferencing seeks to withdraw the appeal. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MARCH 12, 2024 M
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Parties & counsel
- appellant
CHIRAG
- respondent
SANCHIT BANSAL
Coram
VIBHU BAKHRU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court