Petitioners sought permission to vacate a tenanted shop and withdraw the petition. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the pending petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
SHRI NAND KISHOR @ GUDDU & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Rahul Sagar Sahay, Mr.Raghav Rajwalani and Mr.Prince Kumar Singh, Advocates.
versus
NAND KISHORE YADAV & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 18.09.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 18, 2024/ VLD/AM
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:39:58
SHRI NAND KISHOR @ GUDDU & ANR.
NAND KISHORE YADAV & ANR.
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
