Petitioner sought withdrawal of petition after conceding that possession of tenanted premises had already been restored to the respondent. The court permitted withdrawal.
Pet allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~84
MS MULKH RAJ MEHTA AND SONS AND ORS .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Deepak Biswas, Ms. Varsha Agarwal and Mr. Junaid Khan, Advocates
versus
SH ARJIT CHAWLA AND ORS .....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R % 17.09.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 j
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:58:18
MULKH RAJ MEHTA AND SONS AND ORS
SH ARJIT CHAWLA AND ORS
Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
