The petition for land recovery was dismissed as infructuous because the tenanted premises were already restored to the respondent landlord via execution of a warrant in the related revision petition, rendering the current challenge unnecessary.
The petition and pending application were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~72
versus
NAYYARAH QAISER .....Respondent
Through: Mr. I. Ahmed and Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocates
CORAM:
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:58:25
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
stands dismissed being infructuous.
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 N/TK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:58:25
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons V Shri Ajay KhuranaRelied on¶14
RC.REV. 284/2023 titled as Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons V Shri Ajay Khurana
Sunil Bhasin & Anr.
Nayyarah Qaiser
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
