Petition seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's expired mandate in ongoing arbitration. Relying on the Supreme Court's holding that Section 29A applications remain maintainable after expiry, the Court extended the tribunal's mandate for one year to pronounce the award.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
DEEPAK CABLES (INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Aditya Verma, Mr K Rigved Prasad, Advocates
versus
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 10.12.2024
I.A. 47777/2024, I.A. 47778/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 955/2024, I.A. 47779/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:01
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
DECEMBER 10, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:01
1 issue framed by the court
Should the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal be extended for a further period under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5)?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India LimitedRelied on¶5
2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Cables (India) Limited
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
