Sriyansh Kumar Jain v. Kapil Dev Sharma & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration petition disposed of as infructuous upon counsel stating the matter was settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
SRIYANSH KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankit Sinsinwar, Mr. Mohd Sarfaraz, Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocates
versus
KAPIL DEV SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Kashyap, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 09.12.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
DECEMBER 9, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:04:36
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the arbitration petition should be continued or disposed of as infructuous?
SRIYANSH KUMAR JAIN
KAPIL DEV SHARMA
ANR.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court