Allowed

Panipat Jalandhar Tollway Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Auhtority of India

Delhi HC14 Oct 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/807/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed an interim application seeking extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of the award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the deadline to 30.06.2025 due to extensive evidence.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time period for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of arbitral award extended till 30.06.2025.

Panipat Jalandhar Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Highways Auhtority… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~31

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 807/2024

¶4

PANIPAT JALANDHAR TOLLWAY PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dharmendra Rautray, Mrs. Ginny J. Rautray, Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUHTORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Sweta and Ms. Lavanya Kaushik, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 14.10.2024

¶9

I.A. 42009/2024 (Exemption)

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 807/2024

¶13

The present petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of the arbitral award.

¶14

It is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent are engaged in multiple arbitral proceedings before the same Arbitral Tribunal in respect of different contracts. The present petition concerns proceedings before an Arbitral Tribunal referred to as AT-3.

¶15

It is submitted by the respective counsel that the learned Arbitral Tribunal has proceeded with the matter with expedition and dispatch, however, given the nature of the matter and the extensive evidence adduced

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:19:50

¶17

by the parties, some further time is required for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of the arbitral award.

¶18

Consequently, as jointly prayed, the time period for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of arbitral award is extended till 30.06.2025.

¶19

The petition is allowed in the above terms.

¶20

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶21

OCTOBER 14, 2024/ at

¶22

Panipat Jalandhar Tollway Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Auhtority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panipat Jalandhar Tollway Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Auhtority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Universal Agency Ramgarh Pvt. Ltd. Vs Prl Projects and Infrastructure Ltd.

Servo Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India through the Directorate of Procurement

Panipat Jalandhar NH1 Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Highways Authority of India

Aditya Birla Finance Limited Vs Mothers Pride Education Institution Private Limited Ors.

M/S Nipun Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Narayan Buildtech

Ae Tollway Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Irb Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Ltd. Earlier Known as Irb Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Alstom Transport India Ltd. Erstwhile Alstom Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd.

Achanak Associates Vs Director General (Map) Army & Anr.

Kanbe Water Tech Private Limited Vs Anand Devine Developers Private Limited & Anr.

Kanbe Water Tech Private Limited Vs Domus Greens Private Limited & Anr.

Abundance India Vs M/S Gemini Property Developers

M/S Pnsc Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

M/S Fitness for India Vs M/S Suridhi Commercial Infra Pvt. Ltd.