Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of the sole arbitrator's mandate in a construction dispute; the respondent had no objection, the hearing was concluded and award reserved. The court allowed the petition by consent, extending the arbitrator's mandate for eight months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
M/S S. KUMAR CONSTRUCTION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar & Mr. Harsh Kashyap, Advocates.
versus
GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE DEPARTMENT .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Chiranjeev Joshi & Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 10.09.2024
I.A. 38934/2024 ( for exemption )
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 708/2024
Page 1 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 708/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:19:39
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024
‘pv’/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 708/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:19:39
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the sole arbitrator should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S S. Kumar Construction
General Manager Telephone Department
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
