Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of the sole arbitrator's mandate expiring on 27.09.2024. With respondent's consent, the court extended the mandate by six months and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M SUDARSHAN RAO D THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIR MUMMINI DEEPAK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun D. Singh, Mr. Ishat Singh, Mr. Yimyanger Longkumer & Ms. Nisha Pandey, Advocates.
versus
GAIL INDIA LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta & Mr. Rupal Gupta, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 09.09.2024
I.A. 38683/2024 ( Exemption )
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 694/2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 694/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:40:20
arguments.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 ‘pv’/
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 694/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:40:20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the sole arbitrator in the parties' dispute should be extended beyond 27.09.2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M Sudarshan Rao D through his legal heir Mummini Deepak
GAIL India Limited
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
