Allowed

Unicorn Medident Private Limited v. Arora Promoters Private Limited

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/657/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner company sought extension of Sole Arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act. Respondent raised no objection. Court allowed extension for one year from 01.09.2024 and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal for a period of one year from 01.09.2024.

Unicorn Medident Private Limited Vs Arora Promoters… — Company and Corporate | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~31

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 657/2024 & I.A. 37892/2024 UNICORN MEDIDENT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sumitra Choudhary, Mr.M.K. Raghav Raman, Ms. Jasmine Sheikh and Ms. Nitya Sharma, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

ARORA PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sukhpreet Maan, Advocate [M: 9717848201]

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 11.09.2024

¶9

This petition has been filed, under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of the mandate of a Sole Arbitrator, who is in seisin of disputes between the parties arising out of a Memorandum of Understanding dated 30.08.2017.

¶10

The mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal was extended by order dated 09.08.2023 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 205/2023, for a period of one year with effect from 01.09.2023.

¶11

Mr. Sukhpreet Maan, learned counsel for the respondent, appears on advance notice, and states that the respondent has no objection to the relief sought.

¶12

I am informed that the proceedings are at the stage of cross-

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 657/2024

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:23:16

¶17

examination.

¶18

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is allowed and the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal is extended for a period of one year from 01.09.2024.

¶19

The petition, alongwith the pending applications, stands disposed of in these terms.

¶20

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶21

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 SS/

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 657/2024

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:23:16

Unicorn Medident Private Limited v. Arora Promoters Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Unicorn Medident Private Limited v. Arora Promoters Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vas India Communications Private Limited Vs Bharti Airtel Limited

Malwa Solar Power Generation Private Limited Vs M/S Vikram Solar Limited

Uma Shankar Shukla Proprietor of Bol India Bol Vs Bharti Airtel Limited

Iqbal Singh Sethi & Ors. Vs Prasad Ivf Clinic Pvt. Ltd.

Swaranjit Singh Narula Security Agency Vs NTPC Limited

Emco Limited Vs Delhi Transco Limited

Anupam Bajaj Vs Vijay Kumar Sharma

M/S Ratna Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. (Rippl) Vs M/S Meja Urja Nigam Private Limited (Munpl)

Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs New Bridge Business Centre Pvt. Ltd.

Vas India Communications Private Limited Vs Bharti Airtel Limited

Uma Shankar Shukla Proprietor of Bol India Bol Vs Bharti Airtel Limited

Shiv Parkash Bansal & Ors. Vs M/S Surya Maintenance Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Lloyd Insulation(India) Limited Vs Government of NCT of Delhi through Its Executive Engineer ( Health)

Svf Entertainment Private Limited Vs Mx Media and Entertainment Pte. Ltd.