Allowed

Lloyd Insulation(India) Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi through Its Executive Engineer ( Health)

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024O.M.P. (COMM)/56/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed applications for permission to withdraw three connected taxi services petitions. The court allowed the withdrawal applications and dismissed the main petitions as withdrawn due to the petitioner's conscious decision not to litigate further.

What did the court decide?

Applications for withdrawal allowed; main O.M.P. petitions and all pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.

Lloyd Insulation(India) Limited Vs Government of NCT… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~18 to 20

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (COMM) 55/2021 & I.As. 2037/2021, 38438/2024. LLOYD INSULATION ( INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶4

versus

¶5

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OD DELHI THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ( HEALTH ) .....Respondent

¶6

- O.M.P. (COMM) 56/2021 & I.A. 2040/2021, 38549/2024 LLOYD INSULATION(INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ( HEALTH) .....Respondent

¶9

- O.M.P. (COMM) 57/2021 & I.As. 2043/2021, 38538/2024 M/S LLOYD INSULATION (INDIA) LTD. .....Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ( HEALTH ) .....Respondent Appearances:

¶12

Mr. S.P. Mukherjee, Mr. Avinash Shukla, Mr. Kustubh Singh, Mr. Shekhar Banerjee, Ms. Srabani Mukherjee, Advocates for petitioner. Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Nihar Ranjan Singh, Advocates with Mr. Mohd. Seraj Anwar, Assistant Engineer, for GNCTD.

¶13

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

11.09.2024

O.M.P. (COMM) 55/2021 & connected matters.

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 03:19:00

¶20

The petitioner has filed applications (I.A. 38438/2024 in O.M.P. (COMM) 55/2021, I.A. 38549/2024 in O.M.P. (COMM) 56/2021, I.A. 38538/2024 in O.M.P. (COMM) 57/2021) in these three petitions for permission to withdraw the petitions. It is stated that the management of the petitioner company has taken a conscious decision not to litigate these disputes further.

¶21

Mr. S.P. Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, is present and confirms this position.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondent is also present, and has no objection to the application been allowed.

¶23

The applications are, therefore, allowed and O.M.P. (COMM) 55/2021, O.M.P. (COMM) 56/2021, O.M.P. (COMM) 57/2021, alongwith all pending applications, are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶24

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶25

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 “Bhupi”/

¶26

O.M.P. (COMM) 55/2021 & connected matters.

¶27

Page 2 of 2

¶28

Lloyd Insulation(India) Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi through Its Executive Engineer ( Health)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lloyd Insulation(India) Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi through Its Executive Engineer ( Health)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs New Bridge Business Centre Pvt. Ltd.

Vas India Communications Private Limited Vs Bharti Airtel Limited

Uma Shankar Shukla Proprietor of Bol India Bol Vs Bharti Airtel Limited

Shiv Parkash Bansal & Ors. Vs M/S Surya Maintenance Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Unicorn Medident Private Limited Vs Arora Promoters Private Limited

Svf Entertainment Private Limited Vs Mx Media and Entertainment Pte. Ltd.