Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedies; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty sought.
Permission to withdraw petition with liberty to take alternative remedies in law; petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
M/S SURYA MAINTENANCE AGENCY PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Badal Dayal, Ms. Deeksha Sharma, Advocates for R-1 with Mr. Vinod Goyal, AR. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Mr. Rajat Asija, Mr. Divij Garg, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 11.09.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take alternative remedies available to the petitioners in law.
The petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 “Bhupi”/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:15:20
Shiv Parkash Bansal & Ors.
M/s Surya Maintenance Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
