The Delhi High Court, under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extended the mandate of an arbitral tribunal by three months on the consent of both parties.
Mandate of the arbitral tribunal extended by three months with effect from 01.09.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ENKEBEE INFRATECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate.
versus
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Mr. Vyom Raghuvanshi and Ms. Akanksha Rathore, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 10.09.2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 656/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:19:38
until the end of October, 2024.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 ‘Bhupi’/
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 656/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:19:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal upon the consent of both parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Enkabee Infracch India Private Limited
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
