Petition under Section 29A sought extension of the sole Arbitrator's mandate in ongoing arbitration with the respondent. The respondent raised no objection; the Court allowed the petition and extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
VASDEV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Lipika Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 23.01.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 23, 2024 SS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:12:29
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the sole Arbitrator should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vasdev
Govt of NCT of Delhi
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
