Post-award Section 9 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where enforcement proceedings and a Section 34 challenge to the award were already pending. The Court disposed of the petition, leaving the petitioner free to pursue remedies in the enforcement proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S RAMESTH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Mr. Anurag Kaushik, Mr. Jatin Arora, Advocates.
versus
M/S NIRALA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Mr. Irfan Hasieb, Mr. Krishna Jyoti, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
%
23.01.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 23, 2024/ ‘Bhupi’/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:12:18
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Ramesth Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
M/S Nirala Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
