The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the mandate of the arbitral tribunal for six months to enable final arguments between the parties.
Extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal for six months with effect from 29.05.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
M/S PRASAD CONSTRUCTION AND CO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunwar Chandresh, Ms. Poonam Prasad, Ms. Anushka Nigam and Mr. Munis Nasir, Advocates.
versus
WAPCOS LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, SC with Mr. Amrit Pradhan and Ms. Kanchan Singh, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 09.08.2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 594/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:11
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 9, 2024
SS/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 594/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the arbitral tribunal in pending commercial arbitration proceedings may be extended?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Prasad Construction and Co
WAPCOS Ltd
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
