Allowed

Randhawa Construction Private Limited v. Hcbs Promoters and Developers P. Ltd.

Delhi HC7 Aug 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/502/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 29A(4) seeking a six-month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate after its expiry on 28.06.2024; proceedings were at final hearing with a forensic auditor appointed. Respondent raised no objection and the court extended the mandate by six months, regularising the intervening period.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of Arbitral Tribunal extended by 6 months from 07.08.2024; period from 28.06.2024 till date of order regularised.

Randhawa Construction Private Limited Vs Hcbs Promoters and… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 502/2024

¶4

RANDHAWA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr Parmanand Yadav, Adv. (through VC)

¶6

versus

¶7

HCBS PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS P. LTD

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Mr Sankalp Goswami, Adv. Mr Azhar Alam, Adv. (through VC)

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 07.08.2024

¶13

This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of 6 months for concluding the arbitral proceedings and passing the final award.

¶14

It is stated that the arbitral proceedings is at the stage of final hearing on behalf of the respondents and the learned Arbitrator has also appointed a Forensic Auditor. Since, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has expired on 28.06.2024, the present petition has been filed.

¶15

Issue notice.

¶16

Mr Goswami, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and states that he has no objection to the petition being allowed. 5. For the reasons noted above, I am of the view that sufficient cause has

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:13

¶19

been explained for the delay.

¶20

The petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 6 months from today. The period from 28.06.2024 till today stands regularized.

¶21

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶22

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶23

AUGUST 7, 2024 sr

¶24

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:13

Randhawa Construction Private Limited v. Hcbs Promoters and Developers P. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Randhawa Construction Private Limited v. Hcbs Promoters and Developers P. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mypreferred Transformation and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs Hotel Supreme

Trans Image Corporation Vs National Technical Research Organization

Paramount Realtec Pvt. Ltd. Vs Keltech Infrastructure Ltd.

M/S G-Tech Construction and Fabricators Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Shanti Aarogya Jv (Sajv), Nepal Vs Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd.

M/S Dsc Limited - Best Crompton Engineering Projects Ltd. (Jv) Vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited

Spml Infra Ltd. Vs NTPC Limited

Abb India Limited Vs Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Vs v.D.Swami & Co. Ltd.

Som Datt Builders-Ncc-Nec (Jv) Vs National Highways Authority of India

Axis Finance Limited Vs Jimish Shantilal Shah

Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs Hindustan Infrastructure Construction & Anr.

Tech India Engieers Private Limited Vs Triumph Realty Private Limited

Ashok Kumar Singhal Sole Proprietor of M C Construction Co. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi