Allowed

Mrs Shanta Kathuria & Anr. v. Ishwarya Lakshmi Chinnam

Delhi HC9 Aug 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/501/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court, on consent, extended the arbitration mandate by one year, substituted the sole arbitrator with Ms. Kanwal Inder, and directed the continuation of proceedings under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre rules, while preserving rights in related interim petitions.

What did the court decide?

Arbitration mandate extended for one year; sole arbitrator substituted by Ms. Kanwal Inder; proceedings to continue as interim record transmitted to new arbitrator.

Mrs Shanta Kathuria & Anr. Vs Ishwarya Lakshmi Chinnam — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 501/2024

¶4

MRS SHANTA KATHURIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sameer Jain, Mr. Sudarshan Singh Shekhawat, Mr. Anupam Pandey, Mr. Himanshu Singh, Ms. Srishti Agarwal, Advocates. [M:9819683965]

¶5

versus

¶6

ISHWARYA LAKSHMI CHINNAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar & Mr. Satendra Singh, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 09.08.2024

¶10

This petition, under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”] concerns arbitral proceedings arising out of disputes between the parties under a Lease Agreement dated 26.08.2016. The petitioner seeks extension of the mandate for making the award by a period of six months.

¶11

By order dated 13.01.2023 in ARB.P. 1182/2022, a learned sole arbitrator was appointed, who remains in seisin of disputes between the parties. The petitioner is the claimant in the arbitration proceedings. Pleadings have been completed and the proceedings are at the stage of framing of issues. The learned arbitrator has also issued an interim order

¶12

Page 1 of 3

¶13

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 501/2024

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:12

¶16

dated 03.02.2024 under Section 17 of the Act.

¶17

Although a reply has been filed to the petition, a consensus has been achieved in the course of hearing, and learned counsel for the parties request that this petition may be disposed of on that basis.

¶18

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶19

a. The mandate of the arbitration proceedings is extended for a period of one year from today.

¶20

b. The learned arbitrator appointed by the order dated 13.01.2022 is substituted and Ms. Kanwal Inder, former District Judge [Tel: 9810125754] is appointed as the arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes. The learned arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act prior to entering upon the reference.

¶21

c. The arbitration proceedings will continue from the stage as they were before the erstwhile arbitrator. The proceedings filed by the parties and the arbitral record will be placed by the learned parties before the learned arbitrator appointed today. The learned erstwhile arbitrator is also requested to transmit the arbitral record to learned counsel for the parties, who will file it before DIAC.

¶22

d. The arbitration proceedings will be held under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Shershah Road, New Delhi110503 and will be subject to Rules of DIAC, including as to the renumeration of the learned arbitrator.

¶23

e. The learned arbitrator is requested to proceed as expeditiously as possible, notwithstanding the pendency of proceedings arising out of the interim order dated 03.02.2024. Learned counsel for the

¶24

Page 2 of 3

¶25

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 501/2024

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:12

¶28

parties assures the Court that they will cooperate with the learned arbitrator in this endeavour, and no unnecessary adjournments, will be sought.

¶29

f. The proceedings in the arbitration are without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in appeal, the contempt petition [OMP (CONT) 2/2024] and the execution petition, all of which have been filed in respect of the interim order dated 03.02.2024.

¶30

g. It is made clear that this order is passed with consent of the parties and is not intended to reflect upon the conduct of the arbitral proceedings thus far.

¶31

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶32

AUGUST 9, 2024 ‘pv’/

¶33

Page 3 of 3

¶34

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 501/2024

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:36:12

Mrs Shanta Kathuria & Anr. v. Ishwarya Lakshmi Chinnam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs Shanta Kathuria & Anr. v. Ishwarya Lakshmi Chinnam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanti Aarogya Jv (Sajv), Nepal Vs Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd.

M/S Dsc Limited - Best Crompton Engineering Projects Ltd. (Jv) Vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited

Spml Infra Ltd. Vs NTPC Limited

Randhawa Construction Private Limited Vs Hcbs Promoters and Developers P. Ltd.

S. Kumar Construction Vs General Manager Telephone Deptt.

Spml Infra Limited Vs Delhi Jal Board

M/S Shree Shyam Enterprises through Shri v C Garg Vs Indira Gandhi National Open University

M/S Shree Shyam Enterprises through Shri v C Garg Vs Indira Gandhi National Open University

North India Top Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs the New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Kamal Kumar Gupta Vs Jai Kumar Gupta & Ors.

Shanti Aarogya Jv (Sajv), Nepal Vs Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd.

M/S Prasad Construction and Co. Vs Wapcos Ltd.

Sterlite Technologies Ltd. Vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

Bhagwant Rai & Ors. Vs India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd.