Petition seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A; respondent raised no objection, and the mandate was extended to a specified date with the petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Parag Chaturvedi, Advocate. versus NTPC LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Animesh Sinha, Mr. Shubham Budhiraja and Ms. Ishita Pandey, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R
% 08.08.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 8, 2024/ SS/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:43:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended beyond the statutory period under Section 29A.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SPML Infra Ltd.
NTPC Limited
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
