Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of a sole arbitrator's mandate in disputes under a 2015 contract, with final arguments underway. The respondent raised no objection; with consent of parties, the mandate was extended for one year from 05.08.2024 and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
versus
NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION .....Respondent Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 06.08.2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 576/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:51
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 6, 2024 SS/
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 576/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the sole arbitrator should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Trans Image Corporation
National Technical Research Organization
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
