This petition was disposed of as infructuous since the respondent consented to an extension of the Arbitrator's mandate. No substantive legal principles are elucidated in this brief order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
M/S. J. M MHATRE INFRA PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sidhant Dwivedi and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates
versus
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVT. OF INDIA Through:
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 08.07.2024
1. Mr. Sidhant Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the respondent has consented to extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator, this petition has been rendered infructuous and prays that the matter may be disposed of accordingly.
2. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JULY 8, 2024/yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:26:49
M/S. J. M MHATRE INFRA PVT LTD
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVT. OF INDIA
CHARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
