Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate after parties concluded arguments. The court extended the mandate by six months from 20.06.2024, regularised the intervening period, and directed the arbitrator to list no further arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CHIEF ENGINEER DELHI ZONE
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, Mr. OP Verma, Advs.
JASMEET SINGH, J
JULY 9, 2024 / (MS) Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 15:13:16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the arbitrator's mandate should be extended under Section 29A so the award can be pronounced after conclusion of arguments.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.D. Raizada Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India through Chief Engineer Delhi Zone
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
