Rajender Mittal v. Jai Krishna Artec Jv
Case brief
What is this about?
In arbitration petition ARB.P. 164/2024, counsel for the petitioner stated the matter was settled. Consequently, the petition was not pressed and was dismissed as withdrawn.
In arbitration petition ARB.P. 164/2024, counsel for the petitioner stated the matter was settled. Consequently, the petition was not pressed and was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
RAJENDER MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr Kunal Godhwani, Adv. (through VC)
JAI KRISHNA ARTEC JV .....Respondent Through: Mr Siddhant Puri, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 08.07.2024
JASMEET SINGH, J
JULY 8, 2024 sr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:10:38
Rajender Mittal
Jai Krishna Artec JV
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court