The petitioner filed an OMP regarding an arbitral award. The court held the petition to be infructuous as the award was already passed and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise contentions in Section 34 proceedings of Arbitration Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
QUALITY ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma & Mr. Archit Verma, Advocates.
versus
DY CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER CONTRUCTIONS ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 01.02.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 1, 2024 ‘pv’/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:44:45
1 provisions across 1 enactments
QUALITY ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS
DY CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER CONTRUCTIONS
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
