Allowed

M/S Pragati Construction Consultants v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC20 May 2024ARB.P./674/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate a dispute between a private construction firm and the Union of India arising from a government work contract where the respondent failed to nominate an arbitrator within the stipulated time.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Justice Vikramjeet Sen as Sole Arbitrator; parties directed to contact the arbitrator.

M/S Pragati Construction Consultants Vs Union of India & Anr. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~42

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of decision: 20^th May, 2024

¶4

- ARB.P. 674/2024

¶5

M/S PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS

¶6

Through its Partner Sh. Tarun Gupta Having its office at 28/12, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi-110026 Mob:- +91 9313601451 Email:- [email protected] ..... Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner.

¶7

versus

¶8

UNION OF INDIA

¶9

Through the General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi-110001 Represented by:-

¶10

The Deputy Chief Engineer/Const./MB, Northern Railway, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh-244001 Email: [email protected]

¶11

The General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi-110001 Email: [email protected] ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rukhmani Bobde, Mr. Hussain Taqvi and Mr. Amlaan Kumar, Advocates for UOI.

¶12

CORAM:

¶13

ARB. P. 674/2024 Page 1 of 4

¶14

Signature Not Verified

¶15

Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Da te:3 1.05.2024 19:42:52

¶16

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶17

J U D G M E N T ( oral )

¶18

I.A. 29609/2024 (Exemption)

¶19

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶20

The application stands disposed of.

¶21

ARB.P. 674/2024

¶22

The Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeking appointment of an independent sole Arbitrator or a nominee Arbitrator.

¶23

It is submitted by the petitioner that the petitioner is a partnership Firm and is engaged in the business of rendering its various services relating to construction to different agencies including departments of the Government of India.

¶24

The respondent invited tender for the execution of work named and styled as “Construction of four lane ROB in lieu of L-Xing No. 359 (Span 1 X 46.029m) at Km: 1305/14-15 on CHTI-BE Section and L-Xing No. 359A (Spans 1 X 46.050+2X35.613m) at Km: 00/13-14 on CHTI-CH Section on composite steel girder and construction of LHS in lieu of L-Xing No. 359 & 359 A near Baareilly” (hereinafter referred to as „the work‟).

¶25

In response to the invitation to the tender, the petitioner submitted its tender for the work, which was accepted by the respondent No. 1 vide letter of appearance No. 74-W/4/1/411-A/WA/MB dated 25.02.2019.

¶26

The Contract Agreement got executed between the parties, which is governed by Clause 64 of General Conditions of Condition providing settlement of disputes between the parties by Arbitration.

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

ARB. P. 674/2024 Page 2 of 4

¶29

Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Da te:3 1.05.2024 19:42:52

¶30

The petitioner submits that despite all the arrangements having been made by him, the work could not be completed within stipulated period due to various delays, defaults and breaches of the Contract Clauses on the part of the respondent, as mentioned in para 7(vii) of the Petition.

¶31

The work got completed on 31.03.2023. On 19.04.2023, the Completion Certificate had been issued by the respondent. The petitioner vide its Letter dated 25.04.2023 requested for release of Performance Guarantee of Rs.88,10,730/- and Rs.29,20,000/- and the PBG was released on 09.05.2023.

¶32

The petitioner had deposited Security in the form of Bank Guarantee bearing No. 027GT02231490006 dated 29.05.2023, for an amount of Rs.1,80,50,000/- for a period up to 30.11.2023. The cash was released on 28.06.2023 against BGs. Thereafter, vide its Letters dated 22.08.2023 and 23.08.2023, the petitioner informed the respondents about the financial coercion and pressure.

¶33

The petitioner vide its Letter dated 07.03.2024 proposed the nominee Arbitrator Sh. Alok Kumar, CAO Northern Railway (Retd.) and requested the respondent to appoint the Arbitrator within 30 days of receipt of the said letter. 12. Despite service of Letters dated 29.01.2024, 07.03.2024 and 16.03.2024 on the respondent No. 2 and despite expiry of about more than 60 days from 29.01.2024, no response has been received by the petitioner and the respondent has also not nominated its nominee Arbitrator. Moreover, till date neither any payment has been made.

¶34

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection for the appointment of an Arbitrator.

¶35

Considering that there is a valid Arbitration Agreement between the

¶36

Signature Not Verified

¶37

ARB. P. 674/2024 Page 3 of 4

¶38

Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Da te:3 1.05.2024 19:42:52

¶39

parties and in the light of the facts and discussions, the present Petition is allowed and Justice Vikramjeet Sen, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India (M) 8447333366, 9818000290, is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator, to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.

¶40

The parties are at liberty to raise their respective objections before the learned Arbitrator.

¶41

16 This is subject to the Arbitrator making necessary disclosure as under Section 12(1) of A&C Act, 1996 and not being ineligible under Section 12(5) of the A&C Act, 1996.

¶42

The appointment of the Arbitrator shall be governed by the Rules framed by the DIAC including the fees and the disclosure to be made by the learned Arbitrator in conformity of Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶43

Learned counsels for the parties are directed to contact the learned Arbitrator within one week of being communicated a copy of this Order to them by the Registry.

¶44

A copy of this Order be also forwarded to the learned Arbitrator, for information.

¶45

The Petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

¶46

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)

¶47

JUDGE

¶48

MAY 20, 2024/RS

¶49

Signature Not Verified

¶50

ARB. P. 674/2024 Page 4 of 4

¶51

Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Da te:3 1.05.2024 19:42:52

M/S Pragati Construction Consultants v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Pragati Construction Consultants v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Delhivery Limited Vs Far Left Retail Private Limited

Rsb Projects Limited Vs Union of India

Vipin Khanna Vs Sujoy Veer Suri & Ors. & Ors.

Aditya Birla Finance Limited Vs Adi Lakshmi Traders & Ors.

M/S Nitya Nand and Sons Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

Mec Electric Contracts Pvt. Ltd. Vs Netambit Infosource and E-Services Private Limited