Single judge order extending the mandate of an arbitral tribunal by six months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as final arguments were concluded and only the award remained to be pronounced.
The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Mr. Bankim Garg, Mr. Rachit Wadhwa, Ms. Simran Sakunia, Ms. Sonika Singh and Ms. Nikita Salwan, Advs.
versus
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 17.05.2024
I.A.29539/2024 (for exemption)
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 402/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:40:29
tribunal.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
MAY 17, 2024/ dk/rks
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:40:29
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal for the purpose of pronouncing the final award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
