Allowed

Kulbhushan Chawla v. Kamla Devi Chawla & Ors.

Delhi HC20 May 2024CS(OS)/2827/1996

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi decreed the suit on settlement. The defendants (Kamla Devi Chawla and others) and plaintiffs (Kulbhushan Chawla and others) had reached a settlement agreement on 16 May 2024 delineating ownership shares in two properties in Delhi. The court validated the settlement terms and ordered the suit to be decreed accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The suit was decreed in terms of the settlement agreement dated 16th May, 2024.

Kulbhushan Chawla Vs Kamla Devi Chawla & Ors. — Partition | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~2

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of decision:- 20^th May, 2024.

¶4

- CS(OS) 2827/1996 & I.As.14866-67/2019, 13280/2023

¶5

KULBHUSHAN CHAWLA & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Arun Francis & Mr. Kapil Chawla, Advocate for Plaintiff No. 2 (M- 9868072491) Mr. Akshay Bhatia, Adv. for P-1 & 3. versus

¶6

KAMLA DEVI CHAWLA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Aayush Malhotra, Adv. for D-1 to 3, 6 to 9.

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

¶8

JUDGMENT

¶9

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶10

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶11

The present suit relates to two properties namely shop No. 5773, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110054 and shop bearing Nos. 124, 125-129, Main Sadar Bazar, Crockery Market, Delhi. Parties have arrived at a settlement through settlement agreement dated 16^th May, 2024. The settlement is between Mr. Kulbhushan Chawla, Mr. Sheel Kumar Chawla and Ms. Veena Chawla. Parties have agreed to resolve their disputes in respect of both these properties as under:

¶12

“1. That the parties agree and acknowledge that their ownership rights and shares in the following properties are as follows:

¶13

Signature Not Verified

¶14

CS(OS) 2827/1996

¶15

Page 1 of 3

¶16

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 4.05.2024 17:15:04

¶17

(a) Property bearing No. 5773, Sadar Bazar, Delhi (full building till roof top including portions which are currently under the occupation of the tenants)

¶18

The Second Party shall have 50% ownership rights alongwith proportionate and indivisible rights in the land beneath the Property.

¶19

The First Party shall have 25% ownership rights alongwith proportionate and indivisible rights in the land beneath the Property.

¶20

The Third Party shall have 25% ownership rights alongwith proportionate and indivisible rights in the land beneath the Property.

¶21

(b) Shops bearing number 124-129 Crockery Market, Main Sadar Bazaar, Delhi

¶22

The Second Party shall be the absolute owner in respect of the said property”

¶23

The settlement agreement dated 16^th May, 2024 contains paragraphs 1 to 12 in terms of which the parties have settled their disputes. The following parties are present:

¶24

i. Mr. Kulbhushan Chawla is present physically ii. Mr. Sheel Kumar Chawla is present virtually iv. Ms. Veena Chawla is present virtually

¶25

The Court has perused the settlement terms. The same are lawful. There is no impediment in recording the said settlement. It is, accordingly, directed that in terms of the settlement, the suit shall stand decreed. The settlement agreement shall form part of the decree. All parties and anyone acting for or on their behalf shall be bound by the terms of the settlement.

¶26

The amended memo of parties be taken on record.

¶27

The suit is decreed in view of the settlement. All pending

¶28

Signature Not Verified

¶29

CS(OS) 2827/1996

¶30

Page 2 of 3

¶31

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 4.05.2024 17:15:04

¶32

applications are disposed of.

¶33

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE

¶34

MAY 20, 2024 dj/bh

¶35

Signature Not Verified

¶36

Digitally Signed CS(OS) 2827/1996 By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 4.05.2024 17:15:04

¶37

Page 3 of 3

Kulbhushan Chawla v. Kamla Devi Chawla & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kulbhushan Chawla v. Kamla Devi Chawla & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Suparna Sachdev Vs Sh.Sunil Sachdev & Ors.

Vipin Khanna Vs Sujoy Veer Suri & Ors. & Ors.

Shri Inder Prakash Singh Vs Shri Raj Mahatim Singh & Ors.

Surender Pratap Singh Chauhan Vs Smt. Dharamvati & Ors.

Kodak & Anr. Vs A2D Channel & Ors.

Mrs Surjeet Kaur Vs Saradr Raja Singh Oberoi & Ors.

Sonam Goyal Vs Brij Bhushan Gupta & Ors.

Ms Nisha Jha & Anr. Vs Rakesh Bhatnagar & Anr.

Amanpreet Kohli Vs Pankaj Dayal

Ms Suparna Sachdev Vs Sh.Sunil Sachdev & Ors.

Mbl Infrastrucutre Ltd. Vs Pradeep Colonisers and Suppliers Pvt. Ltd.

Sh. Kulbhushan Chawla and Ors. Vs Smt. Veena Chawla and Ors.

M/S Krishna Enterprises Vs Union of India through Ministry of Railways and Anr.

Gail Gas Limited Vs Okay Glass Industries