On settlement between the Plaintiff and Defendants regarding a specific performance suit for property, this court recorded the settlement agreement and disposed of the suit as withdrawn.
Suit disposed of as withdrawn. Court fee refunded to Plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
RAHUL JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jitender Chaudhary & Ms. Shilpa Chohan, Advs. (M: 9811391760)
versus
NEENA SAIGAL & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pulkit Aggarwal, Adv. for D-1. (M: 9999801490) Mr. Attin Shankar Rastogi, Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Mr. Shivkant Arora, Mr. Archit Chauhan & Mr. Adil Vasudeva, Advs. for D-2. (M: 8104624477)
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R
% 16.05.2024
“4. In terms of the arbitration award dated 7th December, 2023, Defendant No.2 is to be paid a sum of Rs.35 lakhs. It appears that the parties can resolve the disputes and the sale deed can be executed in favour of the Plaintiff. It is made clear that if any sale deed is to be signed by Defendant No.2, it could only be done on the basis of payment of Rs. 35 lakhs at the time of registration of the sale deed. No documents in respect
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:35:10
of the property shall be executed between Plaintiff and Defendant no.1 without payment of Rs. 35 lakhs to the Defendant no.2. If the said payment is made, the Defendant no.2 shall not cause any impediment and shall cooperate in ensuring that the title is duly transferred to Plaintiff, in respect of the Ground Floor.
5. List this matter before Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre on 20th February, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. ”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:35:10
terms of the judgment in Nutan Batra v. Buniyaad Builders [(2018) 255 DLT 696] .
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
MAY 16, 2024/ dk/bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:35:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit can be disposed of on account of settlement between parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nutan Batra v. Buniyaad BuildersReferred¶21
[(2018) 255 DLT 696] · Who else cites this
Prathiba Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Prathiba Singh
Parties & counsel
