Petition under Section 29A seeking a 12-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate, which had expired on 29.01.2024 while final arguments were pending. Respondent consented; the court extended the mandate by 12 months from expiry and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
versus
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal and Mr. Ankur Saboo, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R
6. Submissions heard.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 9, 2024/PT
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:37:18
1 issue framed by the court
Should the arbitrator's mandate, expired on 29.01.2024 with final arguments pending, be extended under Section 29A?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Bareilly Highways Project Limited
M/S National Highways Authority of India
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
