The Delhi High Court allowed an application under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to extend the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate by six months, extending it till 30.10.2024, based on respondent's consent.
Extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate till 30.10.2024 and regularisation of the lapsed period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Nain, Advocate.
versus
SANJAY PASSI & ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Samaya Khanna, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
I.A. 6235/2024
O.M.P.(MISC.) (COMM.) 225/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2024 at 12:41:00
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
APRIL 9, 2024/K..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2024 at 12:41:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended due to its expiration.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD
SANJAY PASSI
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
