The Delhi High Court permitted the withdrawal of suit CS(OS) 390/2020 following an inter se settlement between the plaintiff and defendant, allowing the plaintiff to recover court fees.
Order to withdraw the suit and refund court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
SH. V. RAMACHANDRA RAO
..... Plaintiff
Through: Counsel for the plaintiff.
versus
SMT. NEELAM BATRA ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Shivansh Srivastave, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 05.04.2024 1. Learned counsel for the parties submits that they have arrived at a settlement pursuant to which the connected suit CS(OS) 297/2019 has been decreed while the present suit is to be withdrawn.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 5, 2024/K
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:50:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted for the withdrawal of the suit in view of the settlement between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sh. V. Ramachandra Rao
Smt. Neelam Batra
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
