Petitioner sought extension for arbitral proceedings via Section 29A(4). Court allowed petition granting six-months time-frame from date of order.
Six months extension granted for completion of arbitration proceedings in case bearing No. DIAC/2952/04-21.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
RAJINDER PRASHAD GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Saransh Goel, Ms. Laavanya Khanna, Advs.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR...... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, SC with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R
% 19.01.2024
JASMEET SINGH, J
JANUARY 19, 2024/DM
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 14:43:59
Rajinder Prashad Gupta
Delhi Development Authority
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
