Petitions under Section 29A sought extension of the Sole Arbitrator's mandate, with arbitral proceedings at final hearing stage. Exemption applications were allowed subject to just exceptions, the arbitrator's mandate was extended till 30 May 2024, and the petitions were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66 to 68
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 18.01.2024
I.A. 1171/2024 ( for exemption) in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 37/2024 I.A. 1182/2024 ( for exemption) in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 39/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:16:26
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 36/2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 37/2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 39/2024
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
JANUARY 18, 2024 mr/bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:16:26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Brilltech Engineers Private Limited
Paarth Infrabuild Private Limited
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
