Allowed

Svec Construction Limited v. Air Force Naval Housing Board

Delhi HC23 Jan 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/51/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants an extension to the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator in an arbitration proceeding pending between SVEC Construction Limited and the Air Force Naval Housing Board, allowing the process to continue beyond the statutory limit due to pandemic delays and subsequent consensual extensions.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator extended up to 27.08.2024; all steps and proceedings regularized.

Svec Construction Limited Vs Air Force Naval Housing Board — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 51/2024

¶4

SVEC CONSTRUCTION LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay N. Das, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R

¶9

% 23.01.2024

¶10

I.A. 1701/2024

¶11

Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions.

¶12

Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week.

¶13

Application stands disposed of.

¶14

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 51/2024

¶15

By way of the present petition filed under section 29(A)(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (‘A&C Act’), the petitioner seeks extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator, who is seized of the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent.

¶16

Mr. Abhay N. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned Sole Arbitrator was appointed vide order dated 30.08.2019 in ARB. P. 415/2019, whereupon the first hearing in the arbitral proceedings was held on 18.09.2019. It is submitted that thereafter, some delay resulted by reason of the then prevailing COVID-19 pandemic, which period is liable to be excluded for purposes of computing the period under section 29(A)(5) as per the mandate of the Supreme Court in order dated 10.01.2022 In Re:

¶17

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 51/2024

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:20:24

¶21

Cognizance for Extension of Limitation¹ , which inter-alia said that the period from 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022 is liable to be excluded for such purpose.

¶22

Counsel submits that on 20.05.2023, the parties granted a consensual extension to the learned Sole Arbitrator for a period of 06 months, which also expired on 27.08.2023.

¶23

Issue Notice.

¶24

Mr. Yoginder Handoo, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent on advance copy; accepts notice; and does not oppose the prayer made in the petition.

¶25

Upon being queried, learned counsel submit that the matter is now pending for final arguments on their claims and counter-claims, and is likely to be concluded within the next about 06 months.

¶26

In the circumstances, the petition is allowed, thereby extending the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator up to 27.08.2024, as prayed for by the parties; further observing that all steps and proceedings taken in arbitration from 27.08.2023 till today also stand regularised and validated.

¶27

The petition is disposed-of in the above terms.

¶28

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.

¶29

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶30

JANUARY 23, 2024/ ak

¶31

1 (2022) 3 SCC 117

¶32

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 51/2024

¶33

Page 2 of 2

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:20:24

Svec Construction Limited v. Air Force Naval Housing Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Svec Construction Limited v. Air Force Naval Housing Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mcl - Bel (Jv) Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

Montecarlo Limited Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

M/S Ascent Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Logix Heights Pvt. Ltd.

Tecpro Systems Ltd. Vs NTPC Ltd.

M/S. Singh Constructions Vs Union of India

M/S Dilbag Singh Contractor Vs Union of India

Rajeev Chahal and Anr. & Anr. Vs Kiaasa Retail Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Global Buildwell Vs Pushpa Jain

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private Limited Vs Green Infra Wind Energy Ltd.

Vijay Jain and Ors. Vs Omat Business Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Praveen Kumar Jain Vs Rajesh Sharma and Anr.

Sterlite Technologies Limited Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Anr.

M/S Fortune Talkies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Naseem Ahmed

M/S Primatel Fibcom Limited Vs Iti Limited