Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to extend the mandate of an arbitral tribunal handling disputes under two Service Agreements. With counsel's consent, the Court allowed the petition and extended the tribunal's mandate by nine months from 21.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
INDOSPIRIT DISTRIBUTION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anand Shankar Jha, Mr. Sachin M., Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Devgan, Mr. Parvez Rehman, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 16.02.2024
I.A. 3728/2024 ( for exemption )
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 108/2024
Page 1 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 108/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:44:05
consent of the parties, as recorded in its order dated 02.05.2023, for a period of six months with effect from 21.07.2023.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2024 “Bhupi”/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 108/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:44:05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal constituted for disputes under Service Agreements dated 24.04.2018 and 31.03.2020 should be extended.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
INBREW BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED
INDOSPIRIT DISTRIBUTION LIMITED
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
