Appeal where the appellant sought to withdraw it citing a post-hearing settlement; court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw appeal; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
Through: Ms Anu Narula, Advocate along with appellant in person.
SARBJOT KAUR ..... Respondent
Through: Respondent in person. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 28, 2024 / tr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/03/2024 at 11:20:24
Amardeep Singh Johar
Sarbjot Kaur
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
