The High Court of Delhi, passing a non-substantive order, directed that the pending appeal and application be closed as the appeal was not pressed by the counsel.
The appeal and the pending application were closed as the appeal was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DISH TV INDIA LTD ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr Rohan Swarup, Ms Tanya Arora and Mr Sukrit Seth, Advocates.
versus
GULF DTH FZ LLC & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms Niyati Kohli, Mr. K. Singh, Mr Pratham Agarwal and Mr Abhay Agnihotri, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 27.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2024 /rt
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:18:20
DISH TV INDIA LTD
GULF DTH FZ LLC & ORS
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
