The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant on instructions. All pending applications were closed. This order indicates the withdrawal of the matter leaving no substantive ruling on application of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
SHRI AVINASH KUMAR ARYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr D. Pattnaik, Advocate along with appellant in person.
versus
SMT JAI RATI ..... Respondent Through: Ms Mishika Singh, Advocate (DHCLSC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 01.03.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
MARCH 1, 2024/ rt
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/03/2024 at 11:04:55
Shri Avinash Kumar Arya
Smt Jai Rati
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
