The Delhi High Court disposed of a condonation of delay application without objection. Subsequently, upon counsel's instruction not to press the appeal, the main appeal was disposed of without examining the matter on merits.
Neither the delay application nor the appeal was examined on merits and were disposed of without substantive relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocates.
versus
RAMSWAROOP ..... Respondent Through: Ms Deepali Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 27.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
C.M. No. 29937/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellants
seeking condonation of delay filing the appeal]
LPA 476/2023 and C.M. No. 29936/2023 [Application filed on behalf of
the appellants seeking interim relief]
LPA 476/2023 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:18:52
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2024/ kd
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
LPA 476/2023
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:18:52
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR
RAMSWAROOP
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
