Dismissed

M/S Haldia Nirman Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Inland Waterways Authority of India

Delhi HC22 Jul 2024FAO(OS)/102/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge order appointing a sole Arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was challenged. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a Special Leave Petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Present appeal along with the applications dismissed as withdrawn.

M/S Haldia Nirman Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Inland Waterways Authority… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~43

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) 102/2024 & C.M.Nos.40719-40722/2024

¶4

M/S HALDIA NIRMAN PROJECTS PVT. LTD. .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Mr.S.Prem Chandra, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

INLAND WATERWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

¶8

.....Respondent

¶9

Through: None

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶11

O R D E R % 22.07.2024

¶12

Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 25^th January, 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in ARB.P.No.774/2023, whereby the application under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent was allowed and the sole Arbitrator was appointed to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶13

At the outset, this Court has drawn the attention of learned counsel for the appellant to the judgment of the Supreme Court in S.B.P. & Co. vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. & Ors., (2005) 8 SCC 618 , wherein it has been held “ since an order passed by the Chief Justice of the High Court or by the designated Judge of that Court is a judicial order, an appeal will lie against that order only under Article 136 of the Constitution of India to the Supreme Court”.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:57:42

¶15

At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file a Special Leave Petition challenging the impugned order.

¶16

With the aforesaid liberty, present appeal along with the applications is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶17

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶18

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶19

JULY 22, 2024 KA

¶20

M/S Haldia Nirman Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Inland Waterways Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Haldia Nirman Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Inland Waterways Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Neeraj Bhatia Vs Shri Ravindra Kumar Bhatia & Ors.

Lajpat Rai Jagga & Ors. Vs Shri Niranjan Kumar Bansal & Ors.

Dish Tv India Ltd. Vs Gulf Dth Fz Llc & Ors.

Janak Datwani Vs Cna Exports Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Nirmal Jain and Ors. Vs Kohli One Housing and Development Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Smt. Nirmal Jain & Ors. Vs Kohli One Housing and Development Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Dr. Suraj Munjal Vs Chandan Munjal and Ors.

Mr Kamal Kumar Vs Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd.

Resident Welfare Association G and K Block Main Road Kalkaji through Authorized Representative Mr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Shri Umang Sahai Aggarwal & Ors. Vs the Registrar Cooperative Society & Ors.

Bimla Alias Bimla Devi Vs Edelwiess Housing Finance Limited & Anr.

Suraj Mal Vs Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.

Sh Sunny Sachdeva Vs Acp North Rti Cell and Anr.

Manoj Gulati Vs Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors.