The court dismissed the suit and pending applications in default for non-prosecution, noting the plaintiff's consistent absence and failure to provide instructions despite prior intimations of a wish to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
HANEELA BAJWA ..... Plaintiff
Through: None.
versus
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA & ORS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate for D-2 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 22.05.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 22, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:47:05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and obtain instructions for withdrawal.
HANEELA BAJWA
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA & ORS
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
