Application under Section 151 CPC read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing a rejoinder was rendered infructuous because the rejoinder was already on record and the main petition stood reserved for orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate and Ms.
Avsi Malik, Adv.
versus
TARUN WADHWA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sayyam Maheshwari, Adv.
CORAM: JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) MS. TYAGITA SINGH, (DHJS)
% 24.05.2024
Matter is taken up through physical hearing as well as video conferencing .
I.A. 30215/2024 (Application u/S. 151 CPC r/w Sec. 5 Limitation Act filed by petitioner for condonation of delay in filing Rejoinder)
Ld. counsel for Petitioner has stated that Rejoinder has already been taken on record by the Hon’ble Court and arguments in the main petition have been heard on last date of hearing i.e. 21.05.2024 and the petition has been reserved for orders by the Hon’ble Court, hence the present application has become infructuous. Ld. Counsel for Respondents has appeared physically and confirmed this fact.
Heard. In view of abovestated submissions of the parties, I.A. stands disposed off.
TYAGITA SINGH, (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
MAY 24, 2024/sm
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:57:30
Kings Chariot
Tarun Wadhwa
Tyagita Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
