The High Court permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition before Ashu Goyal against the State on account of a settlement arrived at with the respondent, disposing of the connected interim applications.
The present petition is disposed of as withdrawn in view of the Settlement dated 15.05.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
ASHU GOYAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddharth Banthia, Advocate.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Vaish, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Shikhar Aggarwal, Advocate for R-4 with R-4 through VC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 21.05.2024
I.A. 30025/2024 (Exemption)
I.A. 30024/2024 (u/S 151 of CPC, 1908)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:55:48
TEST.CAS. 36/2019
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 21, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:55:48
ASHU GOYAL
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
OTHERS
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
