The High Court of Delhi permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit on the grounds of infructuousness and dismissal with liberty as prayed due to the sale of the suit property.
Permission to withdraw the suit as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
VIVEK SONI ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Ms. Sukanya Singh & Ms. Neharika Chhabra, Advocates. versus MRS ANUPAMA SACHDEVA & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Heena Ahluwalia & Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates for D-1 & 2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
%
24.05.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 24, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/05/2024 at 12:13:51
MRS ANUPAMA SACHDEVA & ANR.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
