Commercial suit withdrawn after jurisdictional objection. Plaintiff sought liberty to withdraw plaint under Section 20(c) CPC to file before Gurugram court; Court returned the plaint under Order VII Rule 10(A)(2) and directed filing at Commercial Courts at Gurugram.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MERAPASHU 360 PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhay Chattopadhyay and Mr. Udipto Koushik Sarmah, Advocates
versus
APOLLO SUPPLY CHAIN PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
.....Defendants Through: Mr. Ketan Gaur, Mr. Neil Chatterjee and Ms. Nidhisha Garg, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R
% 10.12.2024
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 724/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:47:47
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
DECEMBER 10, 2024/ rhc/ms
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 724/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:47:47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Delhi High Court had territorial jurisdiction over the commercial suit given the defendants' objection regarding cause of action.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Merapashu 360 Private Limited
Apollo Supply Chain Private Limited
Anr.
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
