Plaintiffs in a commercial suit sought to withdraw the suit on instructions of counsel; the Delhi High Court dismissed the suit as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
M/S STAR SYRINGE LTD AND ANR. .....Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. Vineet Rohilla, Mr. Rohit Rangi and Mr. Tanveer Malhotra, Advocates Mob: 9833397587
versus
M/S TIGER SURGICAL DISPOSABLE PVT LTD AND ANR.
.....Defendants
Through: Mr. Shamik Sanjaanwala, and Mr. Aditya Tripathi, Advocates Mob: 9910966885
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
DECEMBER 9, 2024 ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 14:40:56
M/S Star Syringe Ltd
Anr.
M/S Tiger Surgical Disposable Pvt Ltd
Anr.
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
