Disposed

Geetanjali Studio Private Limited & Anr. v. M/S Asm Traders & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Dec 2024CS(COMM)/233/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Commercial suit settled without contest; defendants consented to a decree of permanent injunction and agreed to pay Rs. 3 lakhs damages/costs within 30 days, with 12% interest on default; remaining reliefs not pressed.

What did the court decide?

Decree of permanent injunction per prayer clauses 47(i) and (ii); Rs. 3 lakhs damages/costs payable within 30 days, else 12% p.a. interest.

Geetanjali Studio Private Limited & Anr. Vs M/S Asm… — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 233/2024 & I.A. 6247/2024, I.A. 10699/2024

¶4

GEETANJALI STUDIO PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manish Biala, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S ASM TRADERS & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Naveen Kohar, Mr. Vikas Ahlawat and Mr. Nikhil Saroha, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R

¶8

% 09.12.2024

¶9

The defendant no.4/Mr. Mahender Kumar Aggarwal, who is one of the partners in the defendant no.1 firm, is present in Court today. He submits that he is representing the defendant no.1 firm as well as all the other partners/defendants no.2, 3 and 5. He submits through Mr. Naveen Kohar, Advocate appearing on behalf of the defendants that the defendants do not wish to contest the present case on merits and are willing to settle the present suit. He further submits that the defendants are willing to pay Rs.3 lakhs to the plaintiffs towards damages/costs.

¶10

Mr. Manish Biala, counsel appearing for the plaintiffs is agreeable to the same.

¶11

Accordingly, a decree of permanent injunction in terms of prayer clauses 47 (i) and (ii) is passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants. It is further directed that the defendants shall pay a sum of Rs.3

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

CS(COMM) 233/2024

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:54:41

¶15

lakhs to the plaintiffs towards damages/costs within 30 days from today, failing which they will be liable to pay interest on the said amount @12% per annum.

¶16

In view of the above, counsel for the plaintiffs does not press for remaining reliefs in the plaint.

¶17

The suit is decreed in the aforesaid terms.

¶18

Let the decree sheet be drawn up.

¶19

All pending applications stand disposed of.

¶20

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶21

DECEMBER 9, 2024/ PB

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

CS(COMM) 233/2024

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:54:41

Geetanjali Studio Private Limited & Anr. v. M/S Asm Traders & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Geetanjali Studio Private Limited & Anr. v. M/S Asm Traders & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited Vs Frost Falcon Distilleries Limited

Taparia Ware & Cable Vs Navpad Cables & Ors.

Abbott Products Operations Ag & Anr. Vs Atlantis Formulations Private Limited & Ors.

Crossfit, Llc Vs Mohan Lal Sirvi

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. Vs Interio International P Ltd. & Ors.

New Balance Athletics, Inc. Vs Ankur Bansal Trading as Mahadev Enterprises and Ors.

Dfm Foods Ltd. Vs Bhole Baba Food Products LLP

Merapashu 360 Private Limited Vs Apollo Supply Chain Private Limited & Anr.

Crossfit, Llc Vs Mohan Lal Sirvi

Mankind Pharma Limited Vs Anshula Kapoor

Federated Hermes Ltd. Vs John Doe & Ors.

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Limited Vs Mr. Alok Jain & Anr.

Bentley Systems Inc. & Anr. Vs Smec India Private Limited & Anr.

Societe Des Produits Nestle S a Vs the Registrar of Trade Marks