Allowed

Itc Limited v. Omni Plast Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi HC12 Dec 2024CS(COMM)/400/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Defendants agreed to pay litigation costs. Court decreed permanent injunction against defendants, ordered destruction of infringing materials by specific defendants, and directed payment of costs by defendants in specified shares within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Permanent injunction against defendants; Defendants 1 and 3 to destroy infringing materials; Defendants to pay Rs. 6 lakhs collectively (Rs. 1.5 lakhs each for D-1 and D-3, Rs. 3 lakhs for D-2) within

Itc Limited Vs Omni Plast Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 400/2023 with I.A. 11122/2023, I.A. 6562/2024

¶4

ITC LIMITED .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mamta Rani Jha, Ms. Shruttima Ehersa, Ms. Aiswarya Debadarshini and Mr. Rajat Sinha, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

OMNI PLAST PVT LTD & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Aman Gupta, Mr. Akarsh Pandey and Mr. Shivam Mishra, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Mohit Gautam, Advocate for D-2 Mr. Jaspreet Kapur, Mr. Wasim Ansari and Ms. Shweta, Advocates for D-3.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 12.12.2024

¶11

In terms of the previous order passed by this court on 21^st November, 2024, counsel for the defendants have returned with instructions. They submit that the defendants are collectively willing to pay a sum of Rs.6 lakhs to the plaintiff towards litigation costs.

¶12

The counsel for the plaintiff submits that the plaintiff is agreeable to the same.

¶13

In view of the above, a decree of permanent injunction is passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of the prayer clauses 49 (a) to (c) of the plaint.

¶14

In terms of prayer clause 49 (d), the defendants no.1 and 3 shall

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

CS(COMM) 400/2023

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 14:33:17

¶18

destroy all packaging, plates and moulds used for printing the impugned packaging, which is available with them.

¶19

Separate affidavits shall be filed on behalf of the defendants no.1 and 3 stating that all the infringing material has been destroyed by them along with photographs within three weeks.

¶20

In terms of prayer clause (g) of the plaint, the defendants shall collectively pay a combined cost of Rs.6 lakhs to the plaintiff in the following manner:-

¶21

i. The defendant no.1 shall pay Rs.1.5 lakhs,

¶22

ii. The defendant no.3 shall pay Rs.1.5 lakhs.

¶23

iii. The defendant no.2 shall pay Rs.3 lakhs.

¶24

The aforesaid costs shall be paid within three weeks from today, failing which, the defendants will be liable to pay interest on the said amount @12% per annum.

¶25

In view of the aforesaid, the plaintiff does not press for the remaining reliefs sought in the plaint.

¶26

The suit is decreed in the aforesaid terms.

¶27

Decree sheet be drawn up accordingly.

¶28

Since the matter has been settled at an early stage, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 50% of the Court Fees in favour of the plaintiff, in terms of Section 16A of the Court Fees Act, applicable to Delhi.

¶29

All pending applications stand disposed of.

¶30

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶31

DECEMBER 12, 2024/ PB

¶32

Page 2 of 2

¶33

CS(COMM) 400/2023

¶34

Itc Limited v. Omni Plast Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Itc Limited v. Omni Plast Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rupa Gujral & Ors. Vs G. K. Regency & Anr.

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. Vs Interio International P Ltd. & Ors.

New Balance Athletics, Inc. Vs Ankur Bansal Trading as Mahadev Enterprises and Ors.

Dfm Foods Ltd. Vs Bhole Baba Food Products LLP

Boston Ivy Healthcare Solutions Private Limited Vs M/S Accord Medical Products Private Limited

Upcurve Business Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Easy Trip Planners Private Limited & Ors.

Novartis Ag & Anr. Vs Medisave Formulations India LLP

Pfizer Inc. & Ors. Vs Everest Pharmaceuticals Limited & Ors.

New Balance Athletics, Inc. Vs Ankur Bansal Trading as Mahadev Enterprises and Ors.

M/S Modern Machinery Stores Vs M/S F.K Bearing Group Co. Ltd.

Dfm Foods Ltd. Vs Bhole Baba Food Products LLP

Spv Laboratories Private Limited Vs the Controller General of Patents and Designs

Mankind Pharma Limited Vs Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited

Spv Laboratories Private Limited Vs the Controller General of Patents and Designs