Ulike Hospitality (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajiv Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi HCCS(COMM)/436/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court rejected a civil suit under Order VII Rule 11(c) CPC after the plaintiff failed to deposit court fees within the extended time limit, having delayed payment for over a year.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~6
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(COMM) 436/2023 & I.A. 11603/2023 I.A. 11604/2023 I.A. 11605/2023 I.A. 11606/2023 I.A. 11607/2023
¶4
ULIKE HOSPITALITY (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shantanu Singh, Adv. (Through VC)
¶5
versus
¶6
RAJIV MOTORS PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan and Mr. Pranjal Tandon, Advs.
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
¶9
O R D E R
¶10
- % 07.08.2024
¶11
- Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff has not filed the Court Fees within the extended time granted by this Court vide order dated 02.08.2024. He states that the appropriate orders may be passed in the suit.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the suit is liable to be rejected for non-payment of court fees despite extended time?
Coram
AI extract
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court