Allowed

Mars Fishcare North America, Inc. v. Gsm Aquarium Products India LLP

Delhi HC9 Aug 2024CS(COMM)/216/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court decreed a suit filed by Mars Fishcare North America, Inc. against GSM Aquarium Products India LLP on the terms of a settlement agreement dated 18.06.2024. The court also ordered a full refund of court fees paid by the plaintiff.

What did the court decide?

The suit was decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement. A certificate for 100% refund of court fees was directed to be prepared and handed to the plaintiff's counsel.

Mars Fishcare North America, Inc. Vs Gsm… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~40

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 216/2023

¶4

MARS FISHCARE NORTH AMERICA, INC .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Ms. Vaishali R. Mittal, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

GSM AQUARIUM PRODUCTS INDIA LLP .....Defendant Through: Mr. Vikramaditya Singh and Mr. Hardeep, Advocates

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶10

O R D E R % 09.08.2024

¶11

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 18.06.2024, before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The counsel for the parties further submit that their respective parties also support the terms of the aforesaid settlement.

¶12

The counsel for the respective parties confirm the terms of Settlement Agreement dated 18.06.2024 and identify the signatures of their respective clients and pray that the suit be decreed in the terms therein.

¶13

This Court has perused the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 18.06.2024 as recorded inter se the parties and finds them to be lawful.

¶14

As such this Court sees no impediment in decreeing the present

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:33:30

¶17

suit on the basis of the terms contained in the Settlement Agreement arrived inter se the parties. The suit is thus decreed accordingly.

¶18

The parties shall remain bound by the aforesaid terms of Settlement Agreement dated 18.06.2024.

¶19

Learned counsel for the plaintiff prays that since the disputes between the parties have been settled amicably in terms of the Settlement Agreement hence the court fees paid by the plaintiff be refunded in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

¶20

This Court is of the view that since the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled, on an oral prayer made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff, refund of 100% of the court fees paid by the plaintiff is deemed justifiable.

¶21

Let a Certificate of refund of 100% of the court fees paid by the plaintiff be prepared by the Registry and handed over to the learned counsel for the plaintiff.

¶22

The present suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 18.06.2024, which shall form part of the decree sheet.

¶23

Decree sheet be drawn up accordingly.

¶24

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶25

AUGUST 9, 2024/akr

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:33:30

Mars Fishcare North America, Inc. v. Gsm Aquarium Products India LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mars Fishcare North America, Inc. v. Gsm Aquarium Products India LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.D. Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Vs M/S Cento Products (India)

Deism Enterprises Private Ltd. and Another Vs Industrial Finance Corporation of India and Another

Ulike Hospitality (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajiv Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Ireland Unlimitedcompany & Ors. Vs Micro Labs Limited

Shree Ghantakaran Pipes Pvt. Ltd. Vs Annat Jain

Condor Footwear Limited Vs Rajesh Jain

Policybazaar Insurance Web Aggregator & Anr. Vs Acko General Insurance Ltd. & Ors.

Policybazaar Insurance Web Aggregator & Anr. Vs Coverfox Insurance Broking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Raj Vardhan Patodia (Huf) Vs Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Star Television Productions Limited Craigmuir Chambers, P.O. Box 71, Road Town, Tortola British Vir Vs Eurosport 3RUE Gaston Et Rene Caudron F-92130 Issy-Les-Moulineaux France

M/S. Lifestar Pharma Private Limited Vs M/S. Starlife Healthcare

Condor Footwear Limited Vs Rajesh Jain

Policybazaar Insurance Web Aggregator & Anr. Vs Acko General Insurance Ltd. & Ors.

Policybazaar Insurance Web Aggregator & Anr. Vs Coverfox Insurance Broking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.